Tracking 10,000 funds is not the same as knowing which moves matter. HoldingsIntel reads 563 of the largest funds, 89% of US 13F capital, and does the ranking for you: every buy rated for conviction, buying into weakness flagged, and every fund rated on its record. You open the answer, not a filter panel.

HoldingsIntel vs. HedgeFollow

HoldingsIntel

Recommended for holdings research

HedgeFollow

Alternative

Tracking 10,000 funds is not the same as knowing which moves matter.

HoldingsIntel ranks the moves that matter: every buy scored 0–100, funds buying the dip flagged, and four sources in one Verdict per stock.

Reviewed November 8, 2026 · HoldingsIntel Research

Why HoldingsIntel wins

Choose HoldingsIntel for the managers that move the market, every buy scored, weakness-buying flagged, and the ranked answer carried through the REST API and MCP.

Try the better research workflow

Turn public filings into a ranked research answer

Inspect the scored HoldingsIntel positions that separate disclosed commitment from raw portfolio size. Current through Q2 2026.

Free to browse. No account required.

See the highest-conviction moves

Feature-by-feature

Where HoldingsIntel gives you more

HoldingsIntel reads 563 of the largest funds, 89% of US 13F capital, and does the ranking for you: every buy rated for conviction, buying into weakness flagged, and every fund rated on its record. You open the answer, not a filter panel.

Decision matrix comparing HoldingsIntel with HedgeFollow
What matters	HoldingsIntelOur recommendation	HedgeFollow
Coverage	Preferred for this criterion: 563 of the largest funds, holding 89% of US 13F capital	Preferred for this criterion: 10,000+ funds, most of them small
How each position is read	Preferred for this criterion: conviction rated 0–100 on every buy	position sizes and quarter-over-quarter changes
Adds into falling prices	Preferred for this criterion: detected, scored for conviction and ranked each quarter	Double Downs list with filters
Who the manager is	Preferred for this criterion: DNA profile + a 7-dimension star rating per fund	0–5 star fund ratings and per-fund performance stats
Screening and rankings	Preferred for this criterion: ranked analytics and fund ratings	Preferred for this criterion: stock screener, fund ratings, and rankings
Insiders, activists and Congress	Preferred for this criterion: weighed into one Verdict per stock	separate insider, Congress and activist trackers
Research workflow	Preferred for this criterion: ranked web research, REST API, and MCP	browser-based screening, ratings, and rankings

Coverage

HoldingsIntel: Preferred for this criterion: 563 of the largest funds, holding 89% of US 13F capital
HedgeFollow: Preferred for this criterion: 10,000+ funds, most of them small

How each position is read

HoldingsIntel: Preferred for this criterion: conviction rated 0–100 on every buy
HedgeFollow: position sizes and quarter-over-quarter changes

Adds into falling prices

HoldingsIntel: Preferred for this criterion: detected, scored for conviction and ranked each quarter
HedgeFollow: Double Downs list with filters

Who the manager is

HoldingsIntel: Preferred for this criterion: DNA profile + a 7-dimension star rating per fund
HedgeFollow: 0–5 star fund ratings and per-fund performance stats

Screening and rankings

HoldingsIntel: Preferred for this criterion: ranked analytics and fund ratings
HedgeFollow: Preferred for this criterion: stock screener, fund ratings, and rankings

Insiders, activists and Congress

HoldingsIntel: Preferred for this criterion: weighed into one Verdict per stock
HedgeFollow: separate insider, Congress and activist trackers

Research workflow

HoldingsIntel: Preferred for this criterion: ranked web research, REST API, and MCP
HedgeFollow: browser-based screening, ratings, and rankings

Pricing comparison

What you pay, and what the workflow replaces

HoldingsIntelComplete workflow

$19–49 monthly

Holdings-led research, API and MCP workflows in one product.

HedgeFollow

$10–49 monthly

HedgeFollow's prices are billed annually; quarterly billing is $15–66 a month.

What a 10,000-fund roster asks of you

A 10,000-fund roster hands you the filtering. Below the giants sits a long tail of filers that together hold 11% of 13F capital. HoldingsIntel starts where the money is: 563 of the largest funds, $70.7T in disclosed holdings, read position by position.

Switching from HedgeFollow

Keep what you use. Gain the answer.

Coming from HedgeFollow, you keep the fund holdings, quarterly changes, double-down lists and insider trades you use, and gain a conviction score on every buy, a 7-dimension rating on every fund and one four-source Verdict per stock.

Bottom line

For serious holdings research, choose HoldingsIntel

Choose HoldingsIntel for the managers that move the market, every buy scored, weakness-buying flagged, and the ranked answer carried through the REST API and MCP.

See the advantage in the product

Continue from the comparison to current data

Inspect the scored HoldingsIntel positions that separate disclosed commitment from raw portfolio size. Current through Q2 2026.

Free to browse. Paid plans add 13F watchlist alerts when filings change.

See the highest-conviction moves

Questions investors ask

How should I compare HedgeFollow's price with HoldingsIntel?

HoldingsIntel Pro is $19 a month: every buy rated 0–100 for conviction and checked against insider, activist and congressional filings on the same stock. HedgeFollow's plans start at $10 a month billed annually, or $15 a month billed quarterly. HedgeFollow hands you screens to run; HoldingsIntel hands you the ranked answer.

Does HoldingsIntel cover the funds that matter?

Yes: 563 of the largest funds, holding 89% of all US 13F capital. The thousands of other filers on a 10,000-fund list share the remaining 11%.

What does HoldingsIntel add beyond holdings tables?

Judgment. A conviction score on every buy, funds buying into weakness flagged, a 7-dimension rating and DNA profile for every fund, and one Verdict per stock that weighs institutional, insider, activist and congressional filings together.

How this comparison was checked

HoldingsIntel Research checked material competitor facts against official first-party pages on November 8, 2026. Product claims use current HoldingsIntel disclosure data, and undocumented competitor facts are qualified. This comparison is not investment advice.

Evidence map

Comparison overview: HedgeFollow ratings methodology HedgeFollow stock screener HedgeFollow terms HoldingsIntel conviction analysis HoldingsIntel pricing HoldingsIntel backtesting
HoldingsIntel recommendation: HoldingsIntel conviction analysis HoldingsIntel API documentation HoldingsIntel MCP server
Research need: Coverage: HedgeFollow ratings methodology HedgeFollow stock screener HedgeFollow terms HoldingsIntel conviction analysis HoldingsIntel pricing HoldingsIntel backtesting
Research need: How each position is read: HedgeFollow ratings methodology HedgeFollow stock screener HedgeFollow terms HoldingsIntel conviction analysis HoldingsIntel pricing HoldingsIntel backtesting
Research need: Adds into falling prices: HedgeFollow ratings methodology HedgeFollow stock screener HedgeFollow terms HoldingsIntel conviction analysis HoldingsIntel pricing HoldingsIntel backtesting
Research need: Who the manager is: HedgeFollow ratings methodology HedgeFollow stock screener HedgeFollow terms HoldingsIntel conviction analysis HoldingsIntel pricing HoldingsIntel backtesting
Research need: Screening and rankings: HedgeFollow ratings methodology HedgeFollow stock screener HedgeFollow terms HoldingsIntel conviction analysis HoldingsIntel pricing HoldingsIntel backtesting
Research need: Insiders, activists and Congress: HedgeFollow ratings methodology HedgeFollow stock screener HedgeFollow terms HoldingsIntel conviction analysis HoldingsIntel pricing HoldingsIntel backtesting
Research need: Research workflow: HedgeFollow ratings methodology HedgeFollow stock screener HoldingsIntel API documentation HoldingsIntel MCP server
Pricing: HedgeFollow plans and pricing HoldingsIntel pricing
Switching from HedgeFollow: HedgeFollow ratings methodology HedgeFollow stock screener HedgeFollow terms HoldingsIntel conviction analysis HoldingsIntel pricing HoldingsIntel backtesting
What a 10,000-fund roster asks of you: HedgeFollow ratings methodology HedgeFollow stock screener HedgeFollow terms HoldingsIntel conviction analysis HoldingsIntel pricing HoldingsIntel backtesting
Live product proof: HedgeFollow ratings methodology HedgeFollow stock screener HoldingsIntel conviction analysis
How should I compare HedgeFollow's price with HoldingsIntel?: HedgeFollow plans and pricing HoldingsIntel pricing
Does HoldingsIntel cover the funds that matter?: HedgeFollow ratings methodology HedgeFollow stock screener HedgeFollow terms HoldingsIntel conviction analysis HoldingsIntel pricing HoldingsIntel backtesting
What does HoldingsIntel add beyond holdings tables?: HedgeFollow ratings methodology HedgeFollow stock screener HedgeFollow terms HoldingsIntel conviction analysis HoldingsIntel pricing HoldingsIntel backtesting

HoldingsIntel vs WhaleWisdomHedge-fund holdings are public. Knowing which ones matter is not.HoldingsIntel vs StockcircleFollowing gurus is easy. Knowing which ones are worth following is harder.HoldingsIntel vs DataromaSuperinvestor holdings are the starting point, not the answer.

Compare the leading 13F trackers